State of the Fossil-Free Internet 2026

The dirty data center edition

Welcome to the first edition of the State of the Fossil-Free Internet. In this report, we track pathways towards a fossil-free internet and stories of people driving change.

Download PDF

Every day, millions of Green Web Checks are run to verify whether websites are running on green energy. People seek this information around the world. Decisions about what web hosts and data centers to use—and in which regions—are increasingly based on climate considerations. Unfortunately, this type of energy transparency is under attack from the companies that control the majority of the internet’s data centers and cloud servers. What’s more, digital infrastructure was gradually getting greener. Now it’s horribly out of whack.

The Green Web Foundation wants to see a fossil-free internet by 2030, and we’re not alone. The gasses released by fossil fuels—including carbon dioxide (Co2)—are the leading driver of climate change. We develop technical tools and policy measures to facilitate more energy disclosures across all software and hardware. We do this in collaboration with tech developers, businesses, policymakers, and governments, many of whom have their own climate targets.

We continue to work on methods to track the transition away from fossil-fuels, but hitting the 2030 target has recently become harder. This report tells the story of why.

Runaway energy demands from data centers

For this inaugural State of the Fossil-Free Internet, we are casting a spotlight on data centers because it is one of the internet’s largest sources of emissions, and also the one growing the fastest. Perhaps somewhere near you, there is already a massive data center?

Depending on where you live, there soon could be. With the rise of generative AI, the number and scale of data centers has grown, and this trend continues.

There are plans for new data centers worth $3.2 trillion worldwide. They could use green energy—like solar, wind, and hydropower—to power their machines, but they will often choose fossil fuels—like coal, diesel, oil, and natural gas—instead.

How many data centers are there? There is no exact count.

Data Center Map tracks at least 10,852 data centers in 174 countries. However, this number only includes large, publicly known data centers—and not the many, many thousands more that operate privately, on a small scale, or for secret government and military uses.

In comparison, the planned growth is immense. At least 7,250 new data center projects are planned. Construction on as many as 4,300 could begin within the next two years. Two-thirds are in North America, followed by Europe, and Latin America.

The real problem is size. Because generative AI services, like ChatGPT, use more computing power, the companies that dominate the internet—and are competing to dominate AI—are investing aggressively in bigger data centers. These huge facilities are called hyperscale data centers, and there are at least 1,297 around the world. Their campuses can be as big as dozens of football fields. They require enormous amounts of electricity and water, as much as towns or cities. Their owners also hog hardware, like RAM, disk storage, CPUs and chips.

Communities around the world are fighting massive new data center projects for both social and environmental reasons. This is a critical moment to stop an unjust expansion.

The number of hyperscale data centers tripled in the last seven years. So many more are on the way that their total operational capacity could double in the next three years.

Just three companies, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, control around 58% of today’s hyperscale capacity. Other major companies on a global scale are Meta, Alibaba, Tencent, Oracle, Apple, and ByteDance. Both OpenAI and X AI also have big facilities in the US.

It makes sense that the internet needs a lot of data centers, but the fact that generative AI competition is the cause for so many new and enormous ones deserves more scrutiny.

More than half of the growth in energy demand in the US is coming from data centers. In Europe, too, where—data centers currently use an estimated 2,5% of total electricity—anticipated growth could mean a rise to 5% by 2030.

Hyperscale data centers put a massive strain on electricity grids. In many places where utility companies cannot meet demand, data centers build their own gas solutions.

Last year, the US tripled its gas power capacity with data centers as a leading cause, and US greenhouse gas emissions rose for the first time in two years by 2.4%. In the US, the carbon intensity of electricity used by data centers was 48% higher than the national average.

Backup diesel generators at many data centers also release toxic emissions that cause asthma and lung cancer, with medical costs rising significantly for people living near them.

People, in fact, do not want more AI at the cost of their own health or survival.

There are also the threats to local ground water drying up; the rising costs in electricity in many regions; the promised jobs that dissipate after construction ends; and the lack of public transparency over subsidies and even which companies are accountable.

How do we get to a fossil-free internet?

The internet does not need fossil fuels to function. The entire infrastructure could one day run entirely on green energy if corporate interests took a backseat to those of the planet.

It likely wouldn’t even cost companies that much more. Most countries are investing heavily in alternative sources of energy. Already around 41% of the world’s total electricity use comes from renewable energy sources, and clean energy is increasingly affordable and available worldwide.

The internet as a whole demands somewhere in the range of 1-2% of global electricity consumption. Lowering the amount of electricity used is as essential as greening that energy for the internet’s climate impact to go down. It extends from decisions of how to use and power data centers to how we build websites and software.

This is the flowchart

We need more mechanisms to hold major tech companies in check on fossil fuels, and more governance and oversight of their actions all around the world.

For the community of people and organisations working on this issue, a core focus is to get more accurate and granular data about what is happening locally and globally.

Tech companies are eating the planet

Google, Amazon and Microsoft control two thirds of the internet’s cloud services. Because of the concentration of power among the biggest internet companies, just a few companies could theoretically make a huge difference to reducing the global emissions of the internet.

Unfortunately, when they do the opposite, it also has a huge impact. They have invested massively in clean energy, but now they are making massive investments in fossil fuels too. The massive investment in clean energy is used to mask the investment in fossil fuels.

In recent years, all three companies set targets for lowering their climate impact. Amazon set a target of 0 by 2040; Google for 0 by 2030; and Microsoft to be “carbon negative” by 2030.

In reality, their location based emissions—what fossil fuels they actually burn across their facilities—are rising sharply. They all use market-based mechanisms to compensate for them, for instance by buying renewable energy from a different time and place.

On these adjusted counts—if one were to accept the premise of these mechanisms, which we do not—renewable energy use is also rising but doesn’t come close to being enough.

Google, Amazon, and Microsoft all disclose emissions in different ways—but they tend to sugarcoat it and hide the details, especially when it comes to location. Their adjusted market-based energy is prominently celebrated in headlines, while the raw figures are buried.

For instance, Microsoft says it uses a hundred percent renewable energy in its Irish cloud region, but there are massive gas powered engines clearly visible between buildings.

All the biggest internet companies vary in their exact approach, but none publicly disclose their use of fossil fuels in all regions in an actionable format, which would make it technically possible to see how much energy each data center consumes and what fuels it.

This is a transparency challenge we and many industry actors are currently working to solve together through the Green Software Foundation. With a centralized, standardized method for reporting, we could verify how green internet infrastructure is fairly and accurately.

Because of scattered and non-standard reporting, we can only estimate progress towards a fossil-free internet. But we can track progress on transparency for Google, Amazon, and Microsoft using metrics and data collected by the Green Software Foundation.

According to our ranking, these three companies score poorly on transparency.

We hope to keep tracking transparency improvements over time, but with the rise in emissions, the biggest internet companies are becoming less forthcoming than in the past.

Some currently go as far as claiming that their massive AI data center expansions will help the environment, rather than harm it—which is completely false.

All big and small data center operators owe the public accurate data about their realtime, location-based emissions. The market dominance of the biggest, dirtiest companies make it easy to lose sight of smaller data center operators who are leading the way in showing that it’s possible.

Pathways to change

We need action on many different planes to arrive at the fossil-free internet. While many of the challenges are technical, this is essentially a quest for social change and climate justice.

At the Green Web Foundation, we work on a combination of technical tool development, community action, and policy interventions, working with many allies around the world. A common theme across the work we do is to shine a light on the hidden and unmeasured energy use of the internet to invite scrutiny and correct course on climate impact.

Below we share examples of promising pathways we and others are paving to address the core challenges of this moment: The runaway energy demands from data centers; the challenge of greening the internet’s electricity; and the concentration of power tech companies.

What to do about

Runaway energy demands from data centers

The societal benefits of AI are consistently overstated. Draining the last drops of water from drought regions—or emptying green electricity from the local grid—is hard to justify. Despite the popularity of generative AI, people say they don’t want it at any cost. It’s a wasteful product (like lightweight plastic bags) that people use when it’s put into their hands, but is easily replaced by more sustainable options when necessary or required.

Today, people are pushed by tech companies into uses of AI that are frivolous, like video generation for laughs on social media, or AI generated responses in search engines and email apps by default. Companies are pushing AI into everything, personalising AI agents, and encouraging us to voice chat them.

Generative AI is extremely wasteful, but it doesn’t have to be.

Electricity use in the US has risen sevenfold in the past three years, and the Institute for Energy Research estimates that over half of this increase is due to data centers. Last year US greenhouse gas emissions also rose by 2.4% following two years of reductions. We have yet to see evidence that building additional, new hyperscale data centers is worth the social and environmental tradeoffs—anywhere in the world. What we do see is companies actively hiding information about their use of resources from the public.

Many campaigns to pause or scrap data center development have been successful—in the Netherlands, in Chile, Wisconsin, and many other places. Data centers have become a hot political issue due to citizen action and strategic litigation. More people and organizations are calling for moratoriums, including 230 environmental groups in the US at the end of 2025. 

Nonprofit research groups have documented inexplicably high subsidies; misrepresented facts about job growth; and problematic alliances with the fossil fuel industry. This is a moment of low trust in any tech company that claims they will act responsibly wherever they go.

What to do about

Greening the internet’s electricity

We’re calling for the digital sector to cut ties with fossil fuels. No one owns the sun or the wind, which is part of what makes fossil-free energy fairer. The economics of energy are changing, and governments have to prop up oil and gas because of volatility. Access to energy is weaponised between nations. The internet should be liberated from these dynamics.

arrow chevron-down